I have done the argument about 54 cards in a new deck for many decades. But, I also work within the 4 suits of 13 cards each. The whole deck vs the whole set of suits within.Skans » 16 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ No, not semantics. You don't understand the definition of semantics. When you say that a deck of cards has 52 cards, but are wrong because they have more than 52 cards, that's not semantics, that's just WRONG! Clearly wrong. But, not only are you wrong, you will never admit when you are wrong, and I find this slightly more interesting than the fact that you are wrong.
The old Sole-Bait-&-Switch. You never said anything about card games. You were speaking of a deck of cards. But, when you are clearly wrong you try oh-so hard to change the narrative. Foolishly and ineptly try to change the narrative. Such a nonsense thing like getting the number of cards wrong in a deck of playing cards, most normal people would say something like "Oh snap, I forgot about those extra cards - got me, card counting nazi!"
Whole human species with 5 ancestral lineages within each having 5 generation gaps 24/7 never same reproductions again each adapting in series parallel time inhabiting space now.
Please keep insisting that isn't true and self evident to each brain proportionately alive choosing to pretend nobody can prove it in a court of law.